Vinod Kumar v. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/31ST BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 28668 of 2015 (G) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------------- P.V. VINOD KUMAR S/O. P.V. NARAYANAN NAIR VANIYANKANDIYIL HOUSE P.O. MADAPEEDIKA THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENTS:

---------------------------- 1.

THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY KANNUR 670 001 2.

THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR 670 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SANJEETHA K.A.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 28668 of 2015 (G) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 :

COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REGULAR PERMIT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER P2 :

COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY PERMIT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 28668 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of September, 2015

JUDGMENT

Ext. P2 application for temporary permit is pending consideration with the first respondent. I direct the first respondent to consider Ext. P2 application within a period of two weeks.

2.

Ext. P1 application for regular permit is pending consideration with the second respondent. I direct the second respondent to consider Ext. P1 application within a period of one month.

3.

The first respondent shall place the application along with the report before the second respondent to enable a decision being taken. Every endeavour shall be made to consider the application in the ensuing meeting of the second respondent.

The writ petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE