Akhil Purushothaman v. K.A.Jamal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE FRIDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/3RD ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 28674 of 2015 (H) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- 1.

AKHIL PURUSHOTHAMAN AGED 21 YEARS, S/O PURUSHOTHAMAN, MALAYANKADU HOUSE, KLEEZHUMAD PANCHAYATH, ERNAKULAM.

2.

K.J.LIJIYA, 21 YEARS, W/O AHIL PURUSHOTHAMAN, MALAYNKADU HOUSE, KLEEZHUMAD PANCHAYATH, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV. SRI.K.V.SABU RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- 1.

K.A.JAMAL, HOUSE NO.4/152, KSHEMA BHAVA ROAD, KARIPPALAM, MATTANCHERY 682002.

2.

NEJU, S/O K.A.JAMAL, HOUSE NO.4/152, KSHEMA BHAVA ROAD, KARIPPALAM, MATTANCHERRY 682002.

3.

SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, FORT KOCHI POLICE STATION 682001.

4.

SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALUVA POLICE STATION 683106.

5.

SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, LAW AND ORDER, RURAL ALUVA 683101.

R3-R5 BY ADV. STATE ATTORNEY SRI.P.VIJAYARAGHAVAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25-092015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WPC NO.28674/15 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1:

COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT OF MONEY.

EXT.P2:

COPY OF MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE ISSUED FROM PAVAKKULAM SREE MAHADEVA TEMPLE DT. 31.8.15.

EXT.P3:

COPY OF THE DECLARATION DT 18.9.15 SIGNED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER.

EXT.P4:

COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DT 17.9.15 FILED BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

//True Copy// PS to Judge Rp

ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J.

& A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.

================ W.P. (C) No. 28674 of 2015 ================== Dated this, the 25th day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Ashok Bhushan, C.J.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader. No notice is being issued to respondents 1 and 2 in view of the judgment which is being passed.

2.

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for a direction to respondents 3 and 4 to provide police protection from the threat of respondents 1 and 2. Petitioners' case is that both the petitioners being major, they have performed their marriage.

3.

Learned Government Pleader submits that a case was registered for woman missing on a complaint by private respondents and petitioners were produced before the police on 22nd September, 2015. Thereafter, they were also produced before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court where the 2nd

W.P(C) No.28674/15 -:2:- petitioner stated that she shall go with the first petitioner. It is stated that police authorities have already closed the matter in view of the above facts.

In our view of the matter, we see no reason to issue any order as prayed for. Writ petition is, therefore, closed. Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE Rp 25/09/2015 //True Copy// PS to Judge