Sara John v. The District Collector
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/1ST ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 28685 of 2015 (I) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
----------------------- SARA JOHN, W/O.JOHN ABRAHAM, KUNNUTHARA HOUSE, KARAKKAL P.O., PERINGARA, THIRUVALLA.
BY ADV. SRI.T.P.PRADEEP RESPONDENT(S):
---------------------------- 1.
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, PATHANAMTHITTA - 689 645.
2.
THE R. DO. O., REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, THIRUVALLA - 689 101.
3.
AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, PERINGARA, THIRUVALLA - 689 101.
4.
THE SECRETARY, AGRICULTURAL DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANATHPUARM - 695 001.
BY SENIOR SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. C.K.SHERIN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/
WP(C).No. 28685 of 2015 (I) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:
-------------------------------------- EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT DEED DOCUMENT NO.716//2009/1 OF THIRUVALLA SUB REGISTRY DTD.19.3.2009.
EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPH OF THE PETITIONER'S LAND. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT DTD.17.9.2015. EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DTD.21.9.2015 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
***************************************************************************** W.P.(C) No.28685 of 2015 ****************************************************************************** Dated this the 23rd day of September, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, aggrieved by orders passed under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008, preferred revision before the fourth respondent by Ext.P5. The petitioner has approached this Court for seeking an early disposal of Ext.P5 by the fourth respondent.
In that view of the matter, there shall be a direction to the fourth respondent to consider Ext.P5 within two months after issuing notice to the petitioner. Till a decision is taken by the fourth respondent, the status quo shall be maintained. The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln