The Kasaragod District Co-Operative Bank v. The Registrar Of Co-Operative Societies
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/1ST ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 28732 of 2015 (N) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :
---------------------- THE KASARAGOD DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK PB NO. 48, NAYAKS ROAD, KASARAGOD REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER ANIL KUMAR, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. AIYYAPPAN PILLAI. BY ADV. SRI.JAWAHAR JOSE RESPONDENT(S) :
---------------------------- 1.
THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES STATUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001.
2.
THE KANNUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER KANNUR, PIN - 670 001.
3.
THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER DIRECTOR COBANK TOWERS, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN - 695 033.
R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.C. VINCENT R2 BY ADV. SMT.MEENA JOHN, SC R3 BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Mn ...2/-
WP(C).No. 28732 of 2015 (N) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :
EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE PLAINT IN ARC NO. 29/2006 OF THE FILES OF THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES.
EXT.P2 COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR NOTIFYING THE DATE OF POSTING OF THE CASE.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE Mn
V.CHITAMBARESH, J.
--------------------- W.P (C) No.28732 of 2015 --------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of September, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner bank confines its relief to an early consideration of A.R.C No.29/2006 pending on the file of the first respondent. The said arbitration case has been filed by the petitioner against the respondents 2 and 3 under Sec.69 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act.
2.
I direct the first respondent to dispose of A.R.C No.29/2006 pending on his file within a period of four months. Respondents 2 and 3 shall be put on notice and afforded sufficient opportunity to place their objections. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.
sks