Parvathy v. The District Police Chief (Rural)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/9TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 28748 of 2015 (P) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
--------------------------
1. PARVATHY, D/O.USHAKUMARI AGED 23 YEARS CHEVALA MADOM, PUTHIYAKAVU, KILIMANOOR THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
2. SHYAMKUMAR S., S/O.SASIDHARA PILLAI AGED 33 YEARS CHEVALA MADOM, PUTHIYAKAVU, KILIMANOOR THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.J.JAYAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF (RURAL) OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, VIKAS BHAVAN THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 101.
2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KILIMANOOR CIRCLE, OFFICE OF THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR KILIMANOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 601.
3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KILIMANOOR POLICE STATION, KILIMANOOR THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 601.
4. LATHIKA ATHIRA BHAVAN, KILIMANOOR P.O, KILIMANOOR THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 601.
R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. C.R. SYAMKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-102015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 28748 of 2015 (P) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT . P1 - TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 27.3.2013 IN WPC. NO.6141/2013 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE sou.
ASHOK BHUSHAN, CJ & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J -------------------------------------------------------------- W.P(C). No. 28748 of 2015 --------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st October, 2015
JUDGMENT
Ashok Bhushan, CJ.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. No notice is being issued to the fourth respondent in view of the order which is being passed.
2. Petitioners have filed the writ petition alleging police harassment. Petitioner's case is that the mother of the first petitioner has taken certain loans from the fourth respondent, with regard to which respondents 2 and 3 are harassing the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner was arrested on 23.9.2015.
3. Learned Government Pleader after getting instructions submits that crime has already been registered against the petitioner and it is now proceeding with the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court in O.P. 1630 of 2014. Learned Government Pleader further submits that further complaint was received from the fourth respondent and after enquiry of which the parties were advised to get their financial dispute settled by a
W.P.(C). No.28748/15 competent court.
4. In view of the above, we are of the view that it is not a case of any kind of police harassment. The petitioner may take the remedy before the competent court.
With this observation, the writ petition is closed. Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE sou.1/10/15