High Court of KeralaWP(C)/28750/2015disposed of

M.Sadhik v. Secretary, Rta, Palakkad

2015-09-29Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/7TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 28750 of 2015 (P) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------- M.SADHIK, AGED 48 YEARS S/O. LATE MOHAMMED KUNJU, FAHAD MANZIL MURIKKAVU WEST, WEST YAKKARA P.O, PALAKKAD BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT(S):

------------------ THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD 678 001 R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SANJEETHA.K.A.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 28750 of 2015 (P) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ---------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REGULAR PERMIT EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RC BOOK OF THE VEHICLE KL-09 Y 522 EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 14-09-2015 EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO 26955/2015 DATED 11-09-2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL.

----------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE.

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

--------------------- W.P (C) No.28750 of 2015 --------------------- Dated this the 29th day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner seeks clearance certificate in respect of his vehicle being operated on the basis of a valid route permit. Ext.P3 application put in by the petitioner in this regard shall be dealt with by the respondent within two weeks.

2. Such clearance certificate can be granted without insisting on the surrender of the existing regular permit in respect of the vehicle. It shall however be ensured that all dues to the Government including check reports and also to the Kerala Motor Transport Workers Welfare Fund Board are satisfied.

3. The respondent shall also specify a period not exceeding four months within which the petitioner shall replace the vehicle on the route covered by the permit. This is because the vehicle now in use requires to be replaced by another to resume operations on the route covered by the permit.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.

nj/29.9.2015