High Court of KeralaWP(C)/28930/2015disposed of

Christin Joy v. Regional Deputy Director

2015-09-25Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/3RD ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 28930 of 2015 (M) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ CHRISTIN JOY, AGED 21 YEARS S/O. JOY, VAZHAPPILLY HOSUE, CHERUVALOOR P.O. KORATTY, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN:680 321.

BY ADVS.SRI.A.J.VARGHESE SRI.JOSE. V.V.

RESPONDENTS:

----------------------

1. REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR HIGHER SECONDARY DEPARTMENT, EDAPPALLY, ERNAKULAM PIN:682 024.

2. THE MANAGER MAR AUGUSTINE MEMORIAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL KORATTY, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 306.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 28930 of 2015 (M) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- ----------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 - COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B2/21978/RDD/HSE/EKM/2013 DATED 17.05.2014 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P2 - COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 01.06.2015 OF THE PETITIOENR AS LABORATORY ASSISTANT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT MANAGER.

EXHIBIT P3 - COPIES OF THE DECLARATIONS SUBMITTED BY THE MANAGER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P4 - COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER NO.112/2015 DATED 01.06.2015 FORWARDED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL ------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE sp

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P(C). No.28930 of 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of September, 2015.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-approval of Ext.P2 appointment order by the first respondent. The prayer of the petitioner is to direct the first respondent to grant approval of Ext.P2 order within a reasonable time.

In such circumstances, there will be a direction to the first respondent to grant approval of Ext.P2 appointment order as expeditiously as possible and after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that, this Court has not made any observation on merits, which the first respondent will consider in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE sp //True Copy// P.A to Judge.