S.Babu v. Thiruvananthapuram Corporation

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/24TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29026 of 2015 (C) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

--------------- 1.

S.BABU., AGED 62 YEARS S/O.JOSEPH, SREEGADI COTTAGE CHANGAMPUZHA NAGAR P.O., KALAMASSERY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

2.

DR.BHUVANENDU.D.L., AGED 40 YEARS D/O.DEVARAJAN, T.C.68/1052, PACHALAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN (SR.) SMT.P.R.REENA RESPONDENT(S):

------------------ 1.

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY CORPORATION OFFICE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN - 695 033.

2.

SECRETARY THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CORPORATION CORPORATION OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 033. 3.

REGIONAL TOWN PLANNER O/O. REGIONAL TOWN PLANNER HOUSING BOARD BUILDING SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SANJEETHA.K.A.

R BY SRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR,SC,TVPM CORPORATION THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

APPENDIX IN W.P.(C) No.29026 OF 2015 PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT ISSUED TO THE FIRST PETITIONER DATED 13.8.2015 EXHIBIT P1(a) :

TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT ISSUED TO THE SECOND PETITIONER DATED 13.8.2015 EXHIBIT P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED TO THE FIRST PETITIONER DATED 13.8.2015 EVIDENCING FILING OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.

EXHIBIT P2(a) :

TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED TO THE SECOND PETITIONER DATED 13.8.2015 EVIDENCING FILING OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.

EXHIBIT P3 :

TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.33582/2014 DATED 6.3.2015.

RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE.

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

--------------------- W.P (C) No.29026 of 2015 --------------------- Dated this the 16th day of October, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Petitioners confine their relief to an early consideration of the applications put in for building permit. The receipt of the applications is evidenced by Exts.P2 and P2(a) acknowledgments. The second respondent points out that the concurrence of the third respondent is required.

2. I direct the second respondent to forward the applications to the third respondent within two months.

The third respondent shall take the proceedings to a logical end within two months therefrom. Final orders on the applications shall be passed by the second respondent dependent on the orders of the third respondent.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.

nj/16.10.15