High Court of KeralaWP(C)/29255/2014closed

Ranjana Radhakrishnan v. The State Of Kerala

2015-02-04Honourable Mr. Justice P.Ubaid3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/15TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 29255 of 2014 (F) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

---------- RANJANA RADHAKRISHNAN, AGED 50 YEARS, W/O.RADHAKRISHNAN, IV/136 CHEMMANGATTU VALAPPIL HOUSE, PUZHAKKAL VILLAGE THRISSUR DISTRICT BY ADVS.SRI.P.SANTHOSH (PODUVAL) SMT.R.RAJITHA SRI.K.D.SREEVISAKH RESPONDENTS:

---------------

1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 545

3. GIRIJA DEVI, W/O.RAJENDRAN VRINDAVAN, ROSE GARDENS, PERINGAVU, THRISSUR, NOW RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.62 ODIS-D-LOTHA PARADISE, MAJIWADE, THANE MUMBAI - 400 001 R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.P.MAYA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 29255 of 2014 (F) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :

----------------------- EXT.P1 - COPY OF PRIVATE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXT.P2 - COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.267 OF 2005 OF PERAMANGALAM POLICE STATION EXT.P3 - COPY OF ORDER DATED 04-02-2010 IN CRL.MC NO.395/2010 BEFORE THIS HON'BLE COURT EXT.P4 - COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD.21-10-14 IN O.P(CRL)232/14 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:

--------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE ab

P.UBAID, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P(C) No.29255 of 2014 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of February, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The writ petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus for further investigation in Crime No.267/2005 of the Peramangalam Police Station. Now it is reported that the police has already conducted further investigation in the crime, and submitted final report in court. In such a situation this proceeding need not continue. The report is recorded, and the writ petition is closed. P.UBAID JUDGE ab