N.D.Joseph v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/15TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29066 of 2015 (G) ------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :
-------------------------- N.D.JOSEPH, PROPRIETOR, TRAVANCORE EARTH MOVING COMPANY, NELLIMATTATHIL HOUSE, THIRUVAMKULAM P.O, ERNAKULAM. BY ADVS.SRI.M.K.DILEEPAN SRI.DEEPAK T.NEDUNGADAN RESPONDENT(S) :
----------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001.
2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 696 004
3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, LSGD DIVISION, IDUKKI DISTRICT PANCHAYATH, PAINAVU IDUKKI -685 603 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Msd.
WP(C).No. 29066 of 2015 (G) ------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :
---------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1:
TRUE COPY OF THE TENDER NOTICE NO.43/PQ1/EE/LSGD/IDK/ 14-15 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 24-01-2015.
EXHIBIT P2:
TRUE COPY OF THE ELECTION NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 06-05-2015. EXHIBIT P3:
TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY LETTER ISSUED BY PETITIONER TO 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 24-05-2015.
EXHIBIT P4:
TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY 3RD RESPONDENT TO PETITIONER DATED 10-09-2015.
EXHIBIT P5:
TRUE COPY OF THE G.O. (P) NO. 295/15/FIN ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 15-07-2015. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :
------------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE.
Msd.
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
================== W.P.(C).No. 29066 of 2015 ================== Dated this the 6th day of November, 2015
J U D G M E N T
This writ petition is filed for seeking direction to the 3rd respondent to execute an agreement by providing security as per Ext.P2.
2.
It is submitted by the learned Government Pleader that the agreement has already been executed.
In that view of the matter the writ petition is closed. sd/- sab A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE