K.P.Sudha v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/3RD ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29088 of 2015 (I) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:
------------------ K.P.SUDHA, AGED 50 YEARS W/O. V.K. VALSARAJAN HEADMISTRESS-IN-CHARGE THUVAKKUNNU L.P. SCHOOL, P.O. THUVAKKUNNU THALASSERY-670 693, KANNUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD RESPONDENTS:
---------------------- 1.
THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
2.
THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014.
3.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION KANNUR DISTRICT-670 002.
4.
THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER PANOOR, KANNUR DISTRICT-670 692.
5.
THE MANAGER, THUVAKKUNNU L.P. SCHOOL P.O. THUVAKKUNNU, THALASSERY KANNUR DISTRICT-670 693.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 29088 of 2015 (I) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXHIBIT P1 - COPY OF THE SENIORITY LIST.
EXHIBIT P2 - COPY OF THE DEATH CERTIFICATE DATED 04.05.2015. EXHIBIT P3 - COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 01.05.2015 OF THE PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P4 - COPY OF THE ORDER NO.K.DIS.E/1837/2015 DATED 14.07.2015 OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P5 - COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT DATED 10.09.2015.
EXHIBIT P6 - COPY OF THE G.O.(RT) NO.3807/205/G.EDN. DATED 07.09.2015 OF THE GOVERNMENT.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE sp
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
--------------------------------------- W.P(C). No.29088 of 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of September, 2015.
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P5 revision petition dated 07.09.2015 filed before the second respondent. The prayer of the petitioner is to direct the second respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P5 within a reasonable time.
In such circumstances, there will be a direction to the second respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P5 revision petition as expeditiously as possible and after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that, this Court has not made any observation on merits, which the second respondent will consider in accordance with law.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE sp