← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/29315/2014disposed of

Joy V .J v. The Wayanad Primary Co-Operative Agricultural & Rural Development Bank Ltd

2015-01-29Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/9TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 29315 of 2014 (L) ---------------------------- PETITIONERS:

--------------------------

1. JOY V .J., AGED 64 YEARS, S/O.JOHN, VADAKKEVEETTIL, AMBALAKOLLY, VIMALA NAGAR P.O., THAVINHAL AMSOM & DESOM, MANANTHAVADY TALUK, WAYANAD DISTRICT.

2. MONICA, AGED 59 YEARS, W/O.JOY, VADAKKEVEETTIL, AMBALAKOLLY, VIMALA NAGAR P.O., THAVINHAL AMSOM & DESOM, MANANTHAVADY TALUK, WAYANAD DISTRICT, KERALA STATE.

BY ADV. SRI.V.SHYAM RESPONDENTS:

-----------------------

1. THE WAYANAD PRIMARY CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL - RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK (LTD.) NO.L.L.230, PANAMARAM - 670 721 REPRESENTED BYITS SECRETARY.

2. THE SPECIAL SALE OFFICER, WAYANAD PRIMARY CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK, PANAMARAM - 670 721.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. GIKKU JACOB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 29315 of 2014 (L) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS EXT.P1 :

THE TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 16.7.2013 OF THE IST RESPONDENT EXT.P2 :

THE TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DATED 4.10.2014 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE.

V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 29315 OF 2014 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 29th day of January, 2015

JUDGMENT

All that the petitioners pray is for easy instalments to pay the amount due to the first respondent bank. I permit the petitioners to pay the amount due in six equal monthly instalments starting from 18.02.2015.

2.

The coercive steps pursuant to Ext.P1 notice shall be put on hold if the petitioners comply with the conditions in time. The coercive steps can surge ahead if the petitioners commit default in the payment of any one of the instalments as directed. The respondents are free to apply for review of this judgment if aggrieved by the instalment facility granted. The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd