High Court of KeralaWP(C)/29103/2015disposed of

Nizar v. District Collector

2015-09-25Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/3RD ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29103 of 2015 (K) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

----------------- NIZAR, AGED 36 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, M/S. VANIYANTAYYATHU TRASDERS, VATTAPARAMPU, THAZHAVA, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM BY ADVS.SRI.M.V.BOSE SRI.VINOD MADHAVAN SMT.NISHA BOSE ADV.SRI.SARATH.S.PUTHENPARAMPAN RESPONDENTS :

---------------------

1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DISTRICT COLLECTORATE, KOLLAM -691001

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARUNAGAPPALLY POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT - 691001.

3. THE TALUK SUPPLY OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE TALUK SUPPLY OFFICER, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM - 691001. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. MANOJ KUNJACHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 29103 of 2015 (K) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :

P1:

COPY OF THE LICENCE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER UNDER THE FOOD SUPPLY AND STANDARD AUTHORITY OF INDIA ACT DT 30/3/2015. P2:

COPY OF THE LICENCE ISSUED BY THE THODIYUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT DT 11/6/2015.

P3:

COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER UNDER THE KERALA VALUE ADDED TAX DT 18/5/2007. P4:

COPY OF FIR NO. 2743/2015 REGISTERED BY THE KARUNAGAPPALLY POLICE DT 13/9/2015.

P5:

COPY OF THE REPORT DT 15/9/2015, ISSUED BY TSO KARUNAGAPPALLY DT 15/9/2015 P6:

COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DT 18/9/2015 ISSUED BY THE FCI. P7:

COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT 18/9/2015, PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE POLICE RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS :

NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE bp

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.29103 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of September, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner approached this Court on seizure of rice from his godown alleging that they seems to have resemblance with rationed articles.

2. This Court is of the view that the seized articles shall be released to the petitioner on executing a simple bond. However, this will not preclude the authority in proceeding against the petitioner in accordance with law.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE AD