High Court of KeralaWP(C)/29107/2015disposed of

C.A.Joy v. Secretary

2015-09-28Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/6TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29107 of 2015 (K) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

--------------------- C.A.JOY, S/O. ANTHONY, CHALISSERY HOUSE PERINGOTTUKARA P.O.

THRISSUR BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT:

---------------------- THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY THRISSUR - 680 002 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SANJEETHA K.A.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 29107 of 2015 (K) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 :

COPY OF THE REGULAR PERMIT ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER P2 :

COPY OF THE RC BOOK OF THE VEHICLE KL-41 A 6373 P3 :

COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 19.09.2015 P4 :

COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C). NO. 26955/2015 DATED 11.09.2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 29107 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of September, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner seeks clearance certificate in respect of his vehicle being operated on the basis of a valid route permit. Ext.P3 application put in by the petitioner in this regard shall be dealt with by the respondent within two weeks.

2. Such clearance certificate can be granted without insisting on the surrender of the existing regular permit in respect of the vehicle. It shall however be ensured that all dues to the Government including check reports and also to the Kerala Motor Transport Workers Welfare Fund Board are satisfied.

3. The respondent shall also specify the period within which the petitioner shall replace the vehicle on the route covered by the permit. This is because the vehicle now in use requires to be replaced by another to resume operations on the route covered by the permit. The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE