Unnikrishnan v. State Police Chief
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/13TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29160 of 2015 (T) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- UNNIKRISHNAN AGED 46 YEARS S/O. AYYAPPAN, VELUTHEDATH PALLAM HOUSE CHOORATHODU KARA VENGOOR VILLAGE KUNNATHUNADU TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.K.SUNILKUMAR RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. STATE POLICE CHIEF POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -10.
2. THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF (RURAL) DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, ALUVA - 683 101.
3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE PERUMBAVOOR - 683 542.
4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KURUPPAMPADY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 683 545.
R1 -R4 BY ADV. STATE ATTORNEY SRI.P.VIJAYARAGHAVAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-102015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 29160 of 2015 (T) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 - THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DT. 19.9.2015 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT WITH ENGLISH TRNASLATION. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS NIL --------------------------------------- //True Copy// PS to Judge Rp
ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J.
& A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
================ W.P. (C) No. 29160 of 2015 ================== Dated this, the 5th day of October, 2015
J U D G M E N T
Ashok Bhushan, C.J.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned State Attorney.
2.
Petitioner has filed this writ petition alleging police harassment. Petitioner's case is that a case was registered against him being Crime No.1763/2014, in which crime, he was exonerated. It is submitted that now the 3rd respondent has directed the petitioner to appear before the 4th respondent on 22/9/2015. He submits that petitioner having been exonerated, calling the petitioner is nothing but police harassment. 3.
Learned State Attorney after obtaining instructions submits that after the petitioner having been exonerated, de facto complainant has filed a writ petition before this Court and under the direction of this Court, respondents 3 and 4 are further investigating the matter and in that connection, petitioner has
W.P(C) No.29160/15 -:2:- been called, but he has not appeared before the 4th respondent. In the facts of the present case, we do not find any case of police harassment. Writ petition is, therefore, closed. Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE Rp 5/10/2015 //True Copy// PS to Judge