High Court of KeralaWP(C)/29169/2015disposed of

Jiji Antony v. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Kottayam

2015-09-30Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/8TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29169 of 2015 (U) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------------- JIJI ANTONY S/O.JOSEPH ANTONY, VAZHAYIL HOUSE, NARIYANGANAM PO PLASSANAL, KOTTAYAM.

BY ADV. SRI.SAJU J.VALLYARA RESPONDENT:

---------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM PIN-686 002.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SANJEETHA K.A.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 29169 of 2015 (U) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 :

PHOTOCOPY OF THE REGULAR PERMIT VIDE NO.P.ST.5/10018/2005 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE RESPONDENT.

P2 :

PHOTOCOPY OF THE REQUEST DT 22-9-2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 29169 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of September, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner seeks clearance certificate in respect of his vehicle being operated on the basis of a valid route permit. Ext.P2 application put in by the petitioner in this regard shall be dealt with by the respondent within two weeks.

Such clearance certificate can be granted without insisting on the surrender of the existing regular permit in respect of the vehicle. It shall however be ensured that all dues to the Government including check reports and also to the Kerala Motor Transport Workers Welfare Fund Board are satisfied.

The respondent shall also specify the period within which the petitioner shall replace the vehicle on the route covered by the permit. This is because the vehicle now in use requires to be replaced by another to resume operations on the route covered by the permit. The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE