High Court of KeralaWP(C)/29171/2015dismissed as infructuous

The Alwaye Merchant Association v. Authority Under The Kerala Headload Workers Act

2015-09-30Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/8TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29171 of 2015 (V) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- THE ALWAYE MERCHANT ASSOCIATION REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, VYAPARA BHAVAN OLD MARKET ROAD, ALUVA-683 101.

BY ADVS.SRI.A.JAYASANKAR SRI.C.V.MANUVILSAN SRI.MANU GOVIND SRI.S.SABARINADH RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. AUTHORITY UNDER THE KERALA HEADLOAD WORKERS ACT (DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER, ERNAKULAM), CIVIL STATION KAKKANAD PO-682020.

2. ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER ALUVA, CART STAND BUILDING, MARKET ROAD ALUVA-683 101.

3. ERNAKULAM DISTRICT HEADLOAD AND GENERAL WORKERS UNION (CITU) ALUVA OLD MARKET UNIT COMMITTEE REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, AKG MANDIRAM, MO ROAD ALUVA-683 101.

R1 BY ADV. SRI.C.A.MAJEED, STANDING COUNSEL, R2 BY SRI.P.P.PADMALAYAN,GOVERNMENT PLEADER R3 BY SRI.C.S. AJITH PRAKASH, STANDING COUNSEL, THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 3009-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 29171 of 2015 (V) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 : A TRUE COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE 3RD RESPONDENT DT 14-2-2015.

P2 : A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND RAISED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DT 13-3-2015.

P3 :A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER FROM THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DT 22-9-2015.

P4 : A TRUE COPY OF THE STRIKE NOTICE FROM 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DT 15-9-2015.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL TRUE COPY SKS P.A. TO JUDGE

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

-------------------------------------- W.P(C)NO. 29171 OF 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of September, 2015

JUDGMENT

The disputes have since been settled, this writ petition is unnecessary in the circumstances.

The writ petition is disposed of.

V.CHITAMBARESH, JUDGE sks