← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/29172/2015disposed of

Roopesh v. Regional Transporty Authority

2015-09-28Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/6TH ASWINA, 1937 ---------------------------------------- PETITIONERS:

-------------------------- 1.

ROOPESH V., AGED 31 YEARS PADANNAYIL HOUSE NEAR RAILWAY STATION VATAKARA - 673 103 MUHAMMED SHAJEER V.K.

AGED 30 YEARS, VAZHE KOYILOTH HOUSE PURUPPANAM P.O., VATAKARA - 673 105 3.

M.V. RAMESAN, AGED 45 YEARS S/O. KUMARAN, MUTTUNGAVALAPPIL HOUSE PURANKARA P.O., VATAKARA BEACH VATAKARA AMSOM DESOM PIN - 673 103 4.

NAZAR, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O. KUNJI MAMMU VALLIL HOUSE VATAKARA BEACH VATAKARA AMSOM DESOM PIN - 673 103 5.

MUNSIR. T., AGED 22 YEARS, S/O. MUSTHAFA, AGED 22 YEARS, MUSALIYAVITA AZHITHALA, VATAKARA PIN - 673 103 6.

BASHEER, AGED 30 YEARS, S/O. ABDULLA KOTTAPPURATH HOUSE VATAKARA BEACH VATAKARA AMSOM DESOM PIN - 673 103 7.

MADHU M.M., AGED 39 YEARS S/O. KANNAN MUNDIYOTHARA MEETHAL HOUSE PUTHUR, VATAKARA - 673 104

8.

HARIDASN, S/O. GOPALAN MARAR, AGED 32 YEARS KUNNUM METTAL HOUSE MEPPAYIL P.O., VATAKARA PIN - 673 104 9.

SUNESH, AGED 28 YEARS S/O. KUMARAN, THAZHATH KOROTH HOUSE PANIKKOTTY, PUTHUPPANAM P.O.

VATAKARA - 673 105 10.

PRAJEESH P.K., AGED 27 YEARS S/O. KUNJIKANNAN, PURATHE KAYYIL HOUSE PURANKARA P.O., VATAKARA BY ADVS.SRI.ZUBAIR PULIKKOOL SRI.N.P.MAHABOOB RESPONDENTS:

---------------------------- 1.

THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY REP: BY ITS SECRETARY OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY VATAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673 101 THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY VATAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673 101 3.

THE VATAKARA MUNICIPALITY REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MUNICIPALITY OFFICE, VATAKARA, PIN - 673 101 R1 TO R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SANJEETHA K.A. R3 BY ADV. SRI.T.NAVEEN, SC, VATAKARA MUNICIPALITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 :

COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 24.06.2015 P2 :

COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 16.04.2015 P3 :

COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 30.06.2015 P4 :

COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 15.05.2015 P5 :

COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 24.06.2015 P6 :

COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 27.10.2015 P7 :

COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 13.02.2015 P8 :

COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 09.03.2015 P9 :

COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 09.03.2015 P10 :

COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 23.04.2015 P11 :

COPY OF REPORT SUBMITTED BY MVI VATAKARA DATED 15.06.2015 P12 :

COPY OF DECISION TAKEN BY 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 26.03.2013 P13 :

COPY OF APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT P14 :

COPY OF APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT P15 :

COPY OF APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT P16 :

COPY OF APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 4TH PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT P17 :

COPY OF APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 5TH PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT P18 :

COPY OF APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 6TH PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT P19 :

COPY OF APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 7TH PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT

P20 :

COPY OF APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 8TH PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT P21 :

COPY OF APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 9TH PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT P22 :

COPY OF APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 10TH PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 29172 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of September, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioners confine their relief to an early consideration of Exts. P13 to P22 applications. The said applications have been filed seeking variation of permit to enable them to ply autorickshaws within the municipal limits.

I direct the first respondent to consider Exts. P13 to P22 applications with notice to the petitioners. The needful shall be done within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE