Poulose v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE MONDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/6TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29193 of 2015 (Y) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- 1.

POULOSE, AGED 74 YEARS, S/O.CHAKKAPAN, KALAPURACKAL HOUSE, MALA, PALLIPURAM P.O., PALLIPURAM VILLAGE, KODUNGALLOOR TALUK.

2.

ROSLY POULOSE, AGED 65, W/O.POULOSE, KALAPURACKAL HOUSE, MALA, PALLIPURAM P.O., PALLIPURAM VILLAGE, KODUNGALLOOR TALUK.

3.

BINTO K.P., AGED 36, S/O.POULOSE, KALAPURACKAL HOUSE, MALA, PALLIPURAM P.O., PALLIPURAM VILLAGE, KODUNGALLOOR TALUK.

BY ADV. SRI.K.S.RAJEEV (ALUVA) RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- 1.

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY (LAW AND ORDER) GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001. 2.

INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

3.

SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT, CIVIL STATION, AYYATHOLE, THRISSUR - 680 007.

4.

CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MALA POLICE STATION, MALA - 680 732.

BY STATE ATTORNEY SRI.P.VIJAYARAGHAVAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/\

WP(C).No. 29193 of 2015 (Y) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

-------------------------------------- EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF AGREEMENT DTD.28.3.2015 WITH TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION.

EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED TO SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THRISSUR 20.9.2015 WITH TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/

ASHOK BHUSHAN, CJ & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * W.P.C.No.29193 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of September 2015

J U D G M E N T

Ashok Bhushan, CJ Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader.

2.

This writ petition is filed alleging police harassment. Petitioners' case is that petitioners 1 and 2 are husband and wife and the 3rd petitioner is their son. It is submitted that there was strained relationship between the 3rd petitioner and his wife Ditty. It is submitted that petitioners are being called by the police authorities to appear which amounts to police harassment. 3.

The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, would submit that in connection with a complaint submitted by the wife of the 3rd petitioner, 3rd petitioner was called. But he did not appear and crime No.1134/2015 has been registered against the 3rd petitioner.

In view of the above statement, we are of the view that the present is not a case of any police harassment. Hence this writ petition is closed.

(sd/-) (ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE) (sd/-) (A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE) jsr/28/09/2015