Suresh M.P v. The Branch Manager

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/17TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29203 of 2015 (A) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

---------------------- SURESH M.P., MUNDUPALAM NIKATHIL, EDAPALLY (PRESENTLY RESIDING AT GAURI NANDANAM APARTMENT GROUND FLOOR, NUMBERED AS (49/1837F) 36/TR-9 OF KOCHI CORPORATION, PONEKKARA - CHERANALOOR ROAD EDAPALLY NORTH P.O.

BY ADVS.SMT.R.REKHA (KADAVANTHRA) SMT.SURYA SHINE RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. THE BRANCH MANAGER KARUR VYSYA BANK, THRIPUNITHURA BRANCH, THRIPUNITHURA - 682 007.

2. KISHORE KUMAR, GAURI NANDANAM APARTMENT, GROUND FLOOR NUMBERED AS (49/1837F), 36/TR-9 OF KOCHI CORPORATION PONEKKARA - CHERANELLOOR ROAD, EDAPALLY NORTH P.O., ERNAKULAM-682 024.

R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.S.GEORGE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/-

WP(C).No. 29203 of 2015 (A) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1TRUE COPY OF THE RENT AGREEMENT DATED 29/01/2014 ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT-P2TRUE COPY OF THE PROMISSORY NOTE DATED 01/01/2014 IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT-P3TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE BY THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER IN C.M.P. NO. 2960/2015.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL --------------------------------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

=========================================== W.P.(C). No. 29203 of 2015 ===================================================== Dated this the 8th day of December, 2015

JUDGMENT

It is stated by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent bank that the petitioner has not complied with the directions in the interim order dated 25.09.2015. Taking note of the said submission of counsel for the respondent, I am of the view that the petitioner is not entitled to any discretionary relief from this Court in these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Resultantly, the writ petition fails, and is accordingly dismissed.

Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE das /8.12.15