← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/29208/2015disposed of

T.K.Varghese v. State Of Kerala

2015-10-15Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/23RD ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29208 of 2015 (A) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

----------------- T.K.VARGHESE, AGED 59 YEARS, S/O. LATE KAAKKI, THOTTUPURAM HOUSE, CHAMBAKARA, POONITHURA, POONITHURA VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM.

BY ADV. SRI.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE RESPONDENTS :

----------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, HARBOUR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, UNDER DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, HARBOUR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, KAMALEESWARAM MANACAUD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA - 695 009.

3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, HARBOUR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, CENTRAL ZONE, ERNAKULAM KOCHI CORPORATION BUILDING, IIND FLOOR, PARAMARA ROAD ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682 018.

4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, HARBOUR ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, ERNAKULAM DIVISION, MUNAMBAM, PALLIPORT P.O., ERNAKULAM - 683515. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BIJU MEENATOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

bp

WP(C).No. 29208 of 2015 (A) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE SELECTION NOTICE DATED 15/09/2015. EXHIBIT-P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 22/09/2015. EXHIBIT-P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE FRESH SELECTION NOTICE DATED 15/09/2015. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE bp

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P(C).No. 29208 of 2015 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th October, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has been selected for execution of certain work as per Exhibit P1. As per Exhibit P1, the petitioner is directed to remit the security deposit and purchase guarantee.

2. According to the petitioner, he is entitled for certain other amount for the work undertaken on behalf of the same department. The petitioner seeks adjustment of the above amount payable by the petitioner as per Exhibit P1 from the amount due to him.

2. The learned Government Pleader admits that amount is due to the petitioner from the department in respect of certain other work undertaken by him.

In that view of the matter, the amount payable by the petitioner as per Exhibit P1 shall be adjusted from the amount due to him.

The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE vgs16/10/15