R.Girishkumar v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/6TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29225 of 2015 (C) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- R.GIRISHKUMAR ILLATHUPARAMBIL HOUSE KALADY PLANTATION POST 683 583 KALLALA BY ADVS.SMT.SARITHA THOMAS SRI.SAJEEVAN KURUKKUTTIYULLATHIL RESPONDENTS:
----------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
2. PLANTATION CORPORATION OF KERALA LTD.
KOTTAYAM 686 004 REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR THE PLANTATION CORPORATION OF KERALA LTD KOTTAYAM 686 004
4. MR. K, M JOHNY S/O MATHEN, PARAYIKILUKKAN HOUSE, DIVISION E KALLALA ESTATE, KALADY PLANTAION P.O 683 581
5. MR. P K SIVAN S/O PR PADMANABHAN PULLARIKKAL HOUSE, KALLALA FACTORY, KALADY PLANTATION P O 683581
6. MR. AP SHIJU S/O PAPACHAN, ACHANDY HOUSE, AYYAMPUZHA 683 581 R 1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT A LOWSY R BY SRI.RAJU SEBASTIAN VADAKKEKARA, SC, PLANTATION COR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WPC NO.29225/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:
EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE RANK LIST DT 30.3.2007 PUBLISHED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE POST OF TAPPING SUPERVISOR EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DT 18.11.2014 IN WPC NO. 12176/2007 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE ROTATION CHART FOR THE LAST GRADE SERVICE AS PER THE KERALA SUBORDINATE SERVICE RULES EXT.P4; TRUE COY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT 29.4.2015 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE MANAGING DIRECTOR OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL TRUE COPY P.A TO JUDGE jma
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C) No. 29225 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 28th day of September, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner is a rubber tapping worker employed under the 2nd respondent. The petitioner was denied of appointment to the post of tapping supervisor as per Ext.P1 order. As per the roster prescribed in Ext.P3, the petitioner made a representation dated 29.04.2015 by Ext.P4 before the 2nd respondent.
2. In such circumstances, the 2nd respondent shall consider and pass orders on Ext.P4, after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observation as to the merits of the case.
Writ petition is disposed of.
SD/- (K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE) jma //true copy P.A to Judge