P.B Dinesh Kumar v. The Superintending Engineer Pwd
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/6TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29231 of 2015 (D) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :
----------------------- P.B DINESH KUMAR, S/O.P.S.BALAKRISHNA PILLAI, PUTHEN VEED, THENGODE P.O., KAKKANAD, KOCHI - 682 030.
BY ADVS.SRI.G.G.MANOJ SRI.JAICE JACOB SRI.P.M.BENZIR RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUILDINGS, CENTRAL CIRCLE, THRISSUR, PIN - 680 001.
2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUILDINGS DIVISION, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 024.
3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. PIN - 695 001.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. C.K.SHERIN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
WP(C).No. 29231 of 2015 (D) ----------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1:
THE PHOTOCOPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 15.9.2015 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 EXT.P2:
THE PHOTOCOPY OF THE STATEMENT ISSUED BY THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD BUILDINGS (DIVISION), ERNAKULAM. EXT.P3:
THE PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 18.9.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT NO.2 EXT.P4:
THE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, ADJUSTING AN EQUAL AMOUNT OF PENDING BILLS TOWARDS THE SECURITY DEPOSIT DATED 17.11.2014 EXT.P-5:
THE PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGEMENT DATED 18.2.2015 IN WPC NO.4753 OF 2015.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
NIL ----------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
================== W.P.(C).No. 29231 of 2015 ================== Dated this the 28th day of September, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner has been offered work referred in Ext.P1. The petitioner has been directed to furnish security deposit of an amount of Rs. 53,88,254/-. The petitioner is entitled for total 74 lakhs as per Ext.P2 from the same department. 2.
In view of the above, the amount due from the petitioner as per Ext.P1 shall be adjusted from the amount payable to him as per Ext.P2 for the award of work.
The writ petition is disposed of, as above.
sd/- sab A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE
- : 2 :-