High Court of KeralaWP(C)/29315/2015disposed of

The Manager v. State Of Kerala

2015-09-29Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/7TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29315 of 2015 (L) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------------- THE MANAGER KAYALAMALP SCHOOL P.O PERUVAYAL CALICUT 24 BY ADVS.SRI.JIJI THOMAS SMT.SMITHA MATHEW SRI.JOHNY ANDREWS RESPONDENTS:

---------------------------- 1.

STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY PUBLIC EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 303 2.

THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001 3.

THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KOZHIKODE 673 001 4.

ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KOZHIKODE RURAL KOZHIKODE 673 001.

HARITH S LPSA KAYALAM ALP SCHOOL P.O PERUVAYAL, CALICUT 24 R1-R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT A LOWSY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WPC NO. 29315/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1:TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 2.6.2014 EXT.P2: COPY OF THE REJECTION ORDER DT 10.10.2014 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXT.P3: A COPY OF THE REJECTION ORDER DT 30.07.2014 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT EXT.P4: COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN WPC NO. 708/2015 DT 9.1.2015 EXT.P5: COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN W.A. NO.812/2015 DT 9.4.2015 EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION DT 10.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL TRUE COPY P.A TO JUDGE jma

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C) No. 29315 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 29th day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner, a Manager of a School aggrieved by the rejection of appointment of the 5th respondent by the AEO and DEO submitted Ext.P6 revision before the 2nd respondent. The said revision is dated 10.8.2015. The petitioner seeks expeditious consideration of the same.

2. In such circumstances, the 2nd respondent shall consider and pass orders on Ext.P6, after affording the revision petitioner an opportunity of hearing, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observation as to the merits of the case.

Writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- (K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge