M/S. Aron International v. The State Electricity Ombudsman
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/7TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29331 of 2015 (N) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:
------------------- M/S. AARON INTERNATIONAL, PLOT NO.10, INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PLOT, PARAKULAM, ANAKKARA.P.O., PALAKKAD DIST. - 679 551, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT AZAD MANZIL, PANAYIKKULAM, ALUVA - 683 511, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER V.A.AZAD.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.R.AVINASH (KUNNATH) SRI.ABDUL RAOOF PALLIPATH RESPONDENT(S):
--------------------------
1. THE STATE ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN, CHARANGATTU BHAVAN, NO.34/895, MAMANGALAM - ANCHUMANA ROAD, EDAPPALLY, KOCHI - 682 024.
2. THE SECRETARY, KSEB LTD., VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 694 004.
3. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL CIRCLE, SHORNUR, KSEB LTD., PALAKKAD DIST - 679 534.
4. ASST.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION, THRITHALA, KSEB LTD., PALAKKAD DIST - 679 534.
5. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, PADINJARANGADI, KSEB LTD., PALAKKAD DIST - 679 534. BY SRI.SAJEEVKUMAR K.GOPAL, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
mbr/
WP(C).No. 29331 of 2015 (N) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:
EXT. P1 :
TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN OP.87/14-15 DATED 19.5.2014 OF CONSUMER GRIEVANACE REDRESSAL FORUM, KOZHIKODE. EXT. P2 :
TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE 1ST RESPONDENT NO.P/133/2015 DATED 10.7.2015. EXT. P3 :
TRUE COPY OF STATEMENT OF 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 8.15. EXT. P4 :
TRUE COPY OF STATEMENT OF 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 30.7.15. EXT. P5 :
TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO.B1-3436/15/EIP. DATED 31.8.2015. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:
NIL.
//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
=========================================== W.P.(C). No. 29331 of 2015 ===================================================== Dated this the 29th day of September, 2015
JUDGMENT
Challenging Ext.P1 order of the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum, Kozhikode, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 representation before the 1st respondent, and the limited prayer of the petitioner in the writ petition is for a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 representation preferred by the petitioner, expeditiously, after hearing the petitioner.
2.
I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as also the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the official respondents.
On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made across the bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 representation preferred by the petitioner, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent, for further action. Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE das
-2W.P.(C). No. 29331 of 2015