High Court of KeralaWP(C)/29379/2015disposed of

Manager v. State Of Kerala

2015-09-29Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/7TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29379 of 2015 (V) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- MANAGER H NC K A U P SCHOOL KARASSERY MUKKOM KOZHIKODE 673 602 BY ADVS.SRI.JIJI THOMAS SMT.SMITHA MATHEW SRI.JOHNY ANDREWS RESPONDENTS:

---------------------------- 1.

STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARYT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 303 2.

THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001 3.

THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THAMARASSERY, KOZHIKODE 673 573 4.

THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, MUKKOM KOZHIKODE 673 602 5.

SHAHI P U UPSA HNCK AUP SCHOOL KARASSERY. MUKKOM, KOZHIKODE 673 602 R1-R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. A LOWSY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WPC NO. 29379/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBIFS EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DT 02.06.2014 EXT.P2: COPY OF THE REJECTION ORDER DT 10.09.2014 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT EXT.P3: COPY OF THE REJECTION ORDER DT 17.6.2015 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT EXT.P4: COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN WPC NO. 708/2015 DT 9.1.2015 EXT.P5: COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN W.A. NO. 812/2015 DT 9.4.2015 EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION DT 5.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER WITHOUT EXHIBITS RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL TRUE COPY P.A TO JUDGE jma

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C) No. 29379 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 29th day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner, a Manager of a School aggrieved by the rejection of appointment of the 5th respondent by the AEO and DEO submitted Ext.P6 revision before the 2nd respondent. The said revision is dated 5.8.2015. The petitioner seeks expeditious consideration of the same.

2. In such circumstances, the 2nd respondent shall consider and pass orders on Ext.P6, after affording the revision petitioner an opportunity of hearing, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observation as to the merits of the case.

Writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- (K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge