S. Namdev Rangappa Naik v. Lakshadweed Development Corporation Ltd
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/23RD ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29414 of 2015 (B) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:
------------------ S. NAMDEV RANGAPPA NAIK, AGED 60 YEARS 34/436, VIGNEESH, PUTHUKUDI PARAMBA, CIVIL STATION (PO) KOZHIKODE, (RETIRED DEPUTY MANAGER (ACCOUNTS) LAKSHADWEEP DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD).
BY ADVS.SRI.K.SASIKUMAR SRI.S.ARAVIND SRI.P.S.RAGHUKUMAR RESPONDENTS:
----------------------
1. LAKSHADWEED DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.
KOCHI-682 036, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
2. THE GENERAL MANAGER LAKSHADWEED DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.
KOCHI-682 036 BY ADV. SRI.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, SC, LAKSHADWEEP ADMN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 29414 of 2015 (B) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- ----------------------------------- EXT.P1 - COPY OF THE ORDER 27/04/1990 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXT.P2 - COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 11/02/1991 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXT.P3 - COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 12/10/2098 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXT.P4 - COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 13/03/2006 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P5 - COPY OF THE PROMOTION POLICY EXISTING IN THE 1ST RESPONDENT CORPORATION.
EXT.P6 - COPY OF THE REPRESNTATION DATED 05/03/2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P7 - COPY OF THE RREPRESENTATION DATED 06/02/2014. EXT.P8 - COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 20/07/2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXT.P9 - COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 01/09/2015 FORWARDED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE sp
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
--------------------------------------- W.P(C). No.29414 of 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of October, 2015.
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P9 representation dated 01.09.2015 filed before the first respondent. The prayer of the petitioner is to direct the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P9 within a reasonable time.
In such circumstances, there will be a direction to the first respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P9 representation as expeditiously as possible and after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that, this Court has not made any observation on merits, which the first respondent will consider in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE //True Copy// sp P.A. to Judge.