The Manager, Sree Padmanabha Swamy Temple v. The Principal, Chief Conservator Of Forests
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2013/3RD POUSHA, 1935 WP(C).No. 32164 of 2013 (U) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- THE MANAGER, SREE PADMANABHA SWAMY TEMPLE FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM MATHILAKAM OFFICE BY ADV. SRI.N.MAHESH RESPONDENT(S):
---------------------------- 1.
THE PRINCIPAL, CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS FOREST HEAD QUARTERS, VAZHUTHACAUD THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001 2.
THE CHIEF WILD LIFE WARDEN FOREST HEAD QUARTERS VAZHUTHACAUD THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001 BY ADDL. A.G. SRI. K. A. JALEEL BY SRI.M.P.MADHAVANKUTTY, SPL. GOVT. PLEADER FOR FOREST THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24-12-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 32164 of 2013 (U) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT. P1:
COPY OF THE 'CHARTHU' (SACRED LETTER) OF BRAHMASREE THAARANALLOOR N. R. SATHEESAN NAMBOOTHIRIPAD, THE WORSHIPFUL THANTHRI OF SREE PADMANABHA SWAMY TEMPLE, DATED 08.12.2013 EXT. P2:
COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 12.12.2013 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXT. P3:
COPY OF NEWS ITEM OF UNI EXT. P4:
COPY OF COMMON JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P. (C). NO. 34618 OF 2007, 3049 OF 2010 DATED 02.05.2012 EXT. P5:
COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN A SIMILAR CASE W.P.(C). NO. 29551/2013 DATED 02.12.2013 EXT. P6:
COPY OF JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO. 29760/2006 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT DATED 18.08.2007 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE
V.CHITAMBARESH,J.
------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.32164 of 2013 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of December, 2013
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner has filed Ext.P2 representation with the first respondent seeking permission to purchase an elephant. The petitioner seeks early consideration of Ext.P2 representation in view of on going festivals. The petitioner relies on Ext. P4 judgment which has a bearing on the issue.
2.
The first respondent shall make over Ext. P2 representation to the second respondent who shall consider the same. The needful shall be done with due advertence to Ext. P4 judgment after affording to the petitioner an opportunity of being heard. Final orders shall be passed by the second respondent within a period of one week.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH JUDGE