High Court of KeralaWP(C)/29515/2015disposed of

U.V.Anusha v. The State Of Kerala

2015-09-29Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/7TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29515 of 2015 (L) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- U.V.ANUSHA, LABORATORY ASSISTANT V.R. APPU MASTER MEMORIAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL THAIKKAD SOUTH, THRISSUR DISTRICT BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- 1.

THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT'

SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION HOUSING BOARD BUILDINGS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001 3.

THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, ERANAKULAM AT EDAPPALLY 683 024 4.

THE MANAGER, V.R. APPU MASTER MEMORIAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, THAIKKAD SOUTH, THRISSUR DISRICT - 680 104.

R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. A. LOWSY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 29515 of 2015 (L) APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1 COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 4.3.13 OF THE PETITIONER.

EXT.P2 COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 25.09.15 OF THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR EXT.P3 COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT DATED 20.8.15 EXT.P4 COPY OF THE G.O(RT) NO.1577/2015/G.EDN. DATED 25.4.15 OF THE GOVERNMENT EXT.P5 COPY OF THE ORDER NO.A3/5212/15/RDD/HSE DATED 4.7.15 OF THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION.

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:

NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE.

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.29515 of 2015 - L ====================== Dated this the 29th day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P3 revision filed before the 1st respondent. The revision is filed on 20.08.2015.

2. In such circumstance, the 1st respondent definitely will have to look at the revision filed before it and consider the same in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, at any rate within a period of three months from the date of hearing. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on merits, which the 1st respondent will consider, in accordance with law.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB // true copy // P.A to Judge.