High Court of KeralaWP(C)/29637/2015disposed of

Gopinath M.N v. State Of Kerala

2015-09-30Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/8TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29637 of 2015 (D) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- GOPINATH M N MANAGER, JUNIOR BASIC SCHOOL KADAMPAZHIPURAM P O PALAGHAT.

BY ADVS.SRI.JIJI THOMAS SMT.SMITHA MATHEW SRI.JOHNY ANDREWS RESPONDENTS:

------------------------- 1.

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001 2.

THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CHERPLASSERY, PALAGHAT 678 633 3.

P.K MADHUSOODHAN, LPSA (UNDER SUSPENSION) JUNIOR BASIC SCHOOL, KADAMPAZHIPURAM PALAGHAT 678 633 R1-R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. A LOWSY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WPC NO.29637 OF 2015 APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE FIR NO.421/2015 EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN COMPLAINT RECEIVED FROM THE HM EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN COMPLAINT RECEIVED FROM THE PARENTS OF THE STUDENTS EXT.P3(a): A COPY OF THE WRITTEN COMPLAINT RECEIVED FROM THE PARENT OF THE STUDENT EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE SUSPENSION ORDER DATED 14/09/2015 ISSUED TO THE 2ND RESPNDENT EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE REINSTATEMENT ORDER OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 23.9.2015 EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION ALONG WITH THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER DT 23.9.2015 WITHOUT EXHIBITS RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL TRUE COPY P.A TO JUDGE jma

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C) No. 29637 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 30th day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner, a Manager of a School suspended the 3rd respondent in pursuance to the FIR and Ext.P3 complaint as is evidenced at Ext.P4. The said suspension order was rejected by the AEO and directed reinstatement of the 3rd respondent as is evidenced by Ext.P5. As against Ext.P5, the petitioner filed a revision petition before the Government. Ext.P6 revision is dated 23.09.2015. The petitioner seeks expeditious consideration of the same.

2. In such circumstances, the 1st respondent shall consider and pass orders on Ext.P6, after affording the revision petitioner an opportunity of hearing, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observation as to the merits of the case.

Writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- (K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge