High Court of KeralaWP(C)/29707/2015disposed of

T. Soman, S/O.T.Kumaran v. The Sub Collector

2015-09-30Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/8TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29707 of 2015 (K) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- T. SOMAN, S/O.T.KUMARAN, AGED 54 YEARS, THERAVANGALI KUTTY OYATHIL, VELLIPARAMBU, KUTTIKATOOR, KOZHIKODE - 673 001. BY ADV. SRI.NIRMAL S.

RESPONDENT(S):

------------------------- 1.

THE SUB COLLECTOR, THE OFFICE OF SUB COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODE - 673 001.

PERUVAYAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REP: BY SECRETARY, POOVATTUPARAMBU P.O., KOZHIKODE - 673 008.

MOIDEEN, KUTTI OYATHIL, VELLIPARAMBU, KUTTIKATOOR, KOZHIKODE - 673 001.

R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.C.K.SHERIN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

WP(C).No. 29707 of 2015 (K) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

-------------------------------------- EXT. P1: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE FOR HEARING SENT TO DTD.4.6.2014. EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DTD.7.7.2014. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DTD.20.10.2014 SENT BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD.11.11.2014 ALONG WITH THE RECEIPT.

EXT.P5: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DTD.20.11.2014. EXT.P6: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SENT TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DTD.8.1.2015 ALONG WITH THE RECEIPT, EXT.P7: TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE.

Msv/

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

---------------------------------------- W.P(C)No. 29707 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Petitioner approached this Court to enforce Ext.P2 order passed by the first respondent.

2. This Court is of the view that if Ext.P2 has not been interdicted by the competent authority or any higher authority, the first respondent shall implement Ext.P2 order after hearing the petitioner and the third respondent. Needful shall be done within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

This writ petition is disposed of as above.

SD/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, Judge MBS/