← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/29718/2015disposed of

Rafeek v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

2015-09-30Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/8TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29718 of 2015 (L) PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- RAFEEK, AGED 24 YEARS, S/O.KOMAKUTTY, KOLOTHODI HOUSE, ATTASSERY P.O., KARIMBUZHA VILLAGE, OTTAPPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.

(OWNER OF THE LORRY BEARING REGISTRATION NO.KL-57-6825).

BY ADV. SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ RESPONDENT(S):

------------------------- 1.

THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NATTUKAL POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 679 513.

2.

THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OTTAPPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 679 513.

3.

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 679 513.

4.

THE DIRECTOR, MINING AND GEOLOGY, OFFICE OF THE MINING AND GEOLOGY, KEASAVADASAPURAM, PATTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

WP(C).No. 29718 of 2015 (L) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

-------------------------------------- EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT NO.0543 DTD.6.9.2015 OF NATTUKAL POLICE STATION.

EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT DTD.22.11.2014 IN WPC.NO.31228/2014.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

W.P(C)No. 29718 of 2015 Dated this the 30th day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner's vehicle bearing registration No.KL-576825 has been seized alleging transport of river sand without permit. The petitioner requested the Revenue Divisional Officer to take sample and send the same for analysis by the fourth respondent. It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that the sample has already been taken. In view of the above, there shall be a direction to the second respondent to forward the sample to be analysed by the fourth respondent. Needful shall be done within two weeks. Thereafter, the fourth respondent shall send its report after analysing to the second respondent within a further period of two weeks. Based on the receipt of report from the fourth respondent, the second respondent shall finalise the proceedings within two weeks after hearing the petitioner. Till a decision is taken in the matter, the petitioner shall not be

WP(C).NO.29718 OF 2015 :-2-:

arrested pursuant to Ext.P1 FIR. Till a decision is taken by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Ext.P1 proceedings shall stand suspended.

This writ petition is disposed of as above.

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, Judge MBS/

WP(C).NO.29718 OF 2015 :-3-: