Abr Foundation v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE AG.CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/11TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C). No.29982 of 2014 (W) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------- ABR FOUNDATION, (A REGD. CHARITABLE TRUST) HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT PUTHURAN PLAZA, K.P.C.C. JUNCTION, M.G.ROAD, ERNAKULAM - KOCHI - 682 011.
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN SRI.B.R.AJIT S/O.K.B.UNNITHAN.
BY ADVS.SRI.ABRAHAM MATHEW (VETTOOR) SMT.M.J.SAJITHA SMT.BINI ELIZABETH SRI.SRI.ANIL ABEY JOSE RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:- ---------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVT.
HOME AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001.
2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, THRIKKAKARA, ERNAKUALM.
3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERNAKULAM SOUTH, THEVARA P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MARADU POLICE STATION, MARADU P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
5. MR.T.S.SANIL MANAGING DIRECTOR, SILPA PROJECTS & INFRASTRUCTURE (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED, 3RD FLOOR, NORTH AVENUE BLDG, PARAMARA RD, ERNAKULAM NORTH, KACHERIPADY, KOCHI, KERALA - 682 018.
6. MR.VINOD, PROJECT SUPERVISOR SILPA PROJECTS & INFRASTRUCTURE (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED, 3RD FLOOR, NORTH AVENUE BLDG, PARAMARA RD, ERNAKULAM NORTH, KACHERIPADY, KOCHI, KERALA - 682 018.
WP(C). No.29982 of 2014 (W) :2:
7. MR.KANNAN, PROJECT SUPERVISOR SILPA PROJECTS & INFRASTRUCTURE (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED, 3RD FLOOR, NORTH AVENUE BLDG, PARAMARA RD, ERNAKULAM NORTH, KACHERIPADY, KOCHI, KERALA - 682 018.
R5 TO R7 BY ADV.SRI.P.K.RAVISANKAR BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.R.SYAM KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: KRJ
ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P(C) No.29982 of 2014 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2015
JUDGMENT
Shaffique, J Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M.SHAFFIQUE JUDGE krj.2/12/15 //true copy// P.A to Judge