Rosamma Jose v. The District Collector, Idukki District
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/9TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29776 of 2015 (V) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
---------------------- ROSAMMA JOSE, AGED 65 YEARS, W/O.JOSE JOHN, NIRAPPEL PUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE, MANAKKADU VILLAGE, ARIKUZHA, VAZHAITHALA P.O., THODUPUZHA TALUK NOW RESIDING AT NIRAPPEL PUTHENPURAYUIL HOUSE, PERINGAZHA KARA, MARADY VILLAGE, MUVATTUPUZHA TALUK.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.M.JOSHI SMT.SIJI K.PAUL RESPONDENT(S):
------------------------- 1.
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PAINAVU, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685602.
2.
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER (R.D.O.), IDUKKI-655602. 3.
THE SURVEY DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF THE SURVEY & LAND RECORDS, VAZHUTHAKKAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695014.
4.
THE ADDITIONAL THAHSILDAR, THODUPUZHA TALUK, THODUPUZHA, IDUKKI-685584.
5.
THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MANAKKAD VILLAGE, MANAKKAD, IDUKKI-685 608.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PJ
WP(C).No. 29776 of 2015 (V) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P-1: COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT DEED NO.918/2001 DATED 30/3/01 EXECUTED IN FAVOUR OF PETITIONER EXT.P-2: COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 14/9/15 SUBMITTED BEFORE R3 EXT.P-3: COPY OF THE INTIMATION DATED 22/9/15 ISSUED BY R3 TO PETITIONER RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL.
/ TRUE COPY / P.S. TO JUDGE PJ
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
***************************************************************************** W.P.(C) No.29776 of 2015 ****************************************************************************** Dated this the 1st day of October, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner approached the Director of Survey by Ext.P2 to correct the anomalies in the resurvey records. As seen from Ext.P3, this has been forwarded to the Additional Tahsildar, Thodupuzha..
In that view of the matter, the fourth respondent is directed to conclude the proceedings as per Ext.P3 within two months and report the matter to the third respondent. Appropriate decision shall be taken by the third respondent based on the report of the fourth respondent within a further period of one month. The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln