Project Engineering Corporation Limited v. The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/9TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29800 of 2015 (Y) ---------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ST 622/2015 of CHIEF JUDL.MAGISTRATE, ERNAKULAM PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- PROJECT ENGINEERING CORPORATION LIMITED (M/S.KERALA PROJECT ENGINEERING CORPORATION LTD, OLD NAME), 908, PIONEER TOWERS MARINE DRIVE, KOCHI-682 031 REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR SMT.BRINDA RAJIV.
BY ADV. SRI.R.RAJESH(PULLIKADA) RESPONDENT(S):
---------------------------- 1.
THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER(C) EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN, P.B.NO.1895 KALOOR, KOCHI-682 017.
2.
THE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN, P.B.NO.1895 KALOOR, KOCHI-682 017.
BY ADV. DR.S.GOPAKUMARAN NAIR (SR.) BY ADV. SRI.S.PRASANTH, STANDING COUNSEL, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 29800/2015 ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1- TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS UNDER SEC.7A OF THE ACT DATED 11.2.2015 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
P2- TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DATED 21.04.2015 P3- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION REQUESTING WAIVER OF THE PRECONDITION FILED BEFORE THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL P4- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 6.5.2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL TRUE COPY SKS P.A. TO JUDGE
V.CHITAMBARESH, J.
-------------------------------------- W.P(C)NO. 29800 OF 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of October, 2015
JUDGMENT
Ext.P1 proceedings is challenged in Ext.P2 appeal pending. Ext.P3 application for waiver of deposit is also pending consideration. The petitioner apprehends coercive steps in the meanwhile.
2.
Every endeavour shall be made by the Appellate Tribunal to pass orders on Ext.P3 application at the earliest. The coercive steps pursuant to Ext.P1 proceedings shall be put on hold till orders are passed on Ext.P3 application as directed above.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
V.CHITAMBARESH, JUDGE sks