High Court of KeralaWP(C)/29837/2015disposed of

Sulfikar v. Puthupady Grama Panchayath

2015-10-07Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/15TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29837 of 2015 (D) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------------- SULFIKKAR, S/O. MOOSA, AMBAYAKUNUMMAL HOUSE, CHEMMARAMPATTA KAITHAPOYIL P.O., KOZHIKODE - 673 586.

BY ADV. SRI.PRASAD CHANDRAN RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------

1. PUTHUPADY GRAMA PANCHAYATH REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, PUTHUPADY P.O.

KOZHIKODE - 678 588

2. THE SECRETARY, PUTHUPPADY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PUTHUPADY P.O.

KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 678 588

3. K. AYISHAKUTTY, W/O. SULTHAN K.A., NOOR MAHAL, KADAYATTUMMAL KAITHAPOYIL P.O., KOZHIKODE - 673 586.

R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.K.NIJOY R3 BY ADV. SRI.NIRMAL. S THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 29837 of 2015 (D) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1- TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PREPARED BY THE IST RESPONDENT PANCHAYATH EXHIBIT-P2- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 23/09/2015 ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE IST RESPONDENT PANCHAYATH EXHIBIT-P3- TRUE COPY OF THE BUILDING PERMIT DATED 20/07/2015 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT PANCHAYATH EXHIBIT-P4- TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 25/09/2015 BEFORE THE RESPONDENT PANCHAYATH EXHIBIT-P5- TRUE COPY OF THE SITE PLAN.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE DCS

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 29837 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 07th day of October, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner confines his relief to an early consideration of Ext. P4 representation pending with the second respondent. The petitioner alleges that the third respondent is indulging in unauthorised construction which however is strongly refuted.

It is for the second respondent to consider Ext. P4 representation with due advertance to the judgment dated 25.09.2015 in W.P.(C). No. 26787/2015. The orders shall be passed on Ext. P4 representation with notice to the petitioner and the third respondent within a period of one month. The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE DCS