High Court of KeralaWP(C)/29857/2015disposed of

Rachel Thomas v. Mahatma Gandhi University

2015-10-01Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/9TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29857 of 2015 (F) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- RACHEL THOMAS PRINCIPAL ST. MARYS COLLEGE, MANARCAUD MAALAM P.O KOTTAYAM 686 031 BY ADVS.SRI.BABY ISSAC ILLICKAL SRI.ISAAC KURUVILLA ILLIKAL RESPONDENTS ---------------------------- 1.

MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY REGISTRAR M.G. UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, PRIYADARSINI HILLS KOTTAYAM 686560 2.

THE SYNDICATE OF THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY CHAIRMAN VICE CHANCELLOR M.G. UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, PRIYADARSINI HILLS KOTTAYAM 686560 3.

THE MANAGER ST.MARY S COLLEGE MANARCAUD MAALAM P.O., KOTTAYAM 686 031 R1-R2 BY SRI.VARUGHESE M.EASO, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WPC NO. 29857/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1: PHOTOCOY OF THE M.A. DEGREE CERTIFICATE DT 28.2.1983 EXT.P1(a): PHOTOCOY OF THE MPHIL CERTIFICATE DT 22.11.2000 EXT.P2: PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER OF APPROVAL ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT 02.08.2003 EXT.P3: PHOTOCOPY OF THE APPROVAL ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT 12.06.2014 EXT.P4: PHOTOCOPY OF THE CURRENT APPROVAL ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT 26.05.2015 EXT.P5: PHOTOCOPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DT 29.08.2014 EXT.P6: PHOTOCOPY OF THE SENIORITY LIST OF THE TEACHING STAFF IN THE 3RD RESPNDENT S COLLEGE EXT.P7: PHOTOCOPY OF the PROPOSAL FOR APPOINTMENT DT 5.9.2014 EXT.P8: PHOTOCOPY OF the LETTER DT 21.10.2014 OF THE PETITIONER EXT.P9: PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT 2.8.2015 EXT.P10: PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPLY DT 4.9.2015 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL TRUE COPY P.A TO JUDGE jma

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C) No. 29857 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 01st day of October, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved by the inordinate delay in approving her appointment as Principal. Ext.P9 representation is filed by the 3rd respondent and it is pending consideration before the 2nd respondent.

2. In such circumstances, the 2nd respondent shall consider and pass orders on Ext.P9, as expeditiously as possible. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observation as to the merits of the case.

Writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- (K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge