← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/33784/2010closed

K.Abdul Azeez And Others v. Principal Of Unity Women'S College,

2015-06-02Honourable Mr. Justice A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI TUESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE 2015/12TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 33784 of 2010 (W) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

--------------

1. K. ABDUL AZEEZ, AGED 39 YEARS, S/O.MODEEN, TEACHER, 379, KALLAN HOUSE, MARAKKARA, TIRUR.

2.

WIFE P.K.NOORJAHAN, AGED 35 YEARS, TEACHER, RESIDING AT 379, KALLAN HOUSE, MARAKKARA, TIRUR.

3.

FAZNA K., AGED 19 YEARS, D/O.ABDUL AZEEZ, KALLAN HOUSE, MARAKKARA, TIRUR.

BY ADVS.SRI.C.KHALID & SRI.T.P.SAJID.

RESPONDENT(S):

-------------

1. THE PRINCIPAL OF UNITY WOMEN'S COLLEGE, NARUKKARA, MANJERI-676 121.

2. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGEATE, EDUCATION, KOZHIKODE-673 001.

3. STATE REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. R1 BY ADV. SRI.A.A.ABUL HASSAN, R1 BY ADV. SMT.A.M.FASEENA & BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.JUSTIN JACOB.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

rvs.

WP(C).No. 33784 of 2010 (W) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :

------------------------ EXT. P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION ON 19/10/2010. EXT. P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION ON 28/10/2010 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

---------------------- EXT. R1(A) : TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 01/10/2010 SUBMITTED BY THE TEACHER.

EXT. R1(B) : TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 11/10/2010 OF THE MATRON.

/TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE RVS.

A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J --------------------------------------------- WPC No.33784 of 2010 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of June, 2015

JUDGMENT

The matter relates to an issue which arose on account of the refusal of the respondent college in permitting the petitioner to attend the classes. This Court by interim order dated 16.11.2010 permitted the petitioner to attend the classes. It is reasonable to presume that the petitioner might have completed the course by this time.

As there is no surviving cause of action, this writ petition is closed making the interim order absolute. sd/- A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE css/ true copy P.S.TO JUDGE