M.Ramakrishna Pillai v. The Regional Transport Authority, Attingal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/15TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 29924 of 2015 (M) PETITIONER:
-------------------------- M.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, KULANGARA VEEDU, KILIMANOOR PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENTS:
----------------------------
1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ATTINGAL REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN-695 101.
2. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ATTINGAL, PIN-695 101.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SANJEETHA K.A.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 29924 of 2015 (M) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 :
TRUE COPY OF THE VARIATION APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DT 5-3-2015. P2 :
TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN ITEM NO.45 OF THE MEETING DT 18-4-2015.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE DCS
V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 29924 OF 2015 Dated this the 07th day of October, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner laments that Ext. P1 application for variation of the regular permit is being adjourned repeatedly. Ext. P2 proceedings adjourning the consideration of Ext. P1 application is relied on. 2.
I direct the first respondent to consider Ext. P1 application with notice to the petitioner within a period of one month.
The writ petition is disposed of.
V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE DCS