Muhammed M.K v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/13TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 30063 of 2015 (G) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------- MUHAMMED M.K AGED 29 YEARS S/O. PAKKU M.K., HSST (JR) ENGLISH, THIRUVANGOOR HSS, RESIDING AT MANATHAMKANDI HOUSE IRINGATH P.O., KOZHIKODE BY ADV. SRI.JAMES ABRAHAM (VILAYAKATTU) RESPONDENTS:

---------------------------- 1.

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.

2.

THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SANTHI NAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 95 001.

3.

THE MANAGER, THIRUVANGOOR HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, THIRUVANGOOR, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT 678 304.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. A. LOWSY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 30063 of 2015 (G) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE APPROVAL ORDER PASSED BY THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, VADAKARA.

P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. ACD.B1/19774/2013/HSE DATED 16.7.2014 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT P3 :

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.ACD.B1/19774/14/HSE DATED 25.8.2014 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT P4 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION DATED 30.8.2014 FILED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT WITHOUT ANNEXURES RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 30063 of 2015 (G) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 5th day of October, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner's grievance is that Ext.P4 revision dated 30.08.2014 has not been considered till date by the 1st respondent.

2.

Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider the revision, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, within three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment. The Writ Petition is disposed of without any observation on merits, which shall be decided by the 1st respondent, in accordance with law.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj