V.C. Praveen v. The State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/20TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 30070 of 2015 (G) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- V.C. PRAVEEN SON OF V.R CHANDRASEKHARAN, MANAGER, SNUP SCHOOL KOCHUKOIKAL, PATHANAMTHITTA 689 667 BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI.M.SAJJAD RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPRUAM 695 001
2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPRUAM 695 014
3. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PATHANAMTHITTA 689 001 R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 30070 of 2015 (G) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO ACD .A2/10403 HSE/2013 DATED 13-01-2014 OF THE DIRECTOR EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE NO OBJECTION CERTIFICATE DATED 04-02EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 7-09-2015 ADDRESSED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 7-09-2015 EXHIBIT P5: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLCIATION FOR CHANGE OF MANAGEMENT DATED 25-09-2015 EXHIBIT P6: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF THE PETITIONER DATED 25-09EXHIBIT P7: TRUE COPY OF THE G.O(RT) NO 2637/14/G.EDN DATED 03-07-2014 OF THE GOVERNMENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE SB
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
===================== W.P.(C) No.30070 of 2015 - G ====================== Dated this the 12th day of October, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P6 representation filed before the 1st respondent. The representation is filed on 25.09.2015.
2. In such circumstance, the 1st respondent definitely will have to look at the representation filed before it and consider the same in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, at any rate within a period of three months from the date of hearing. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on merits, which the 1st respondent will consider, in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB/12 /10 /2015 // true copy // P.A to Judge.