← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/30116/2015disposed of

Jyoti Lakshmi N. v. The Secretary

2015-10-053 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/13TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 30116 of 2015 (L) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ JYOTHILAKSHMI N., AGED 34 YEARS, W/O. JAYAKUMAR, RESIDING AT "SOORYAJYOTHI", KATTUKULAM P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT PIN 679 514. BY ADVS.SRI.K.V.JAYADEEP MENON SRI.T.P.RAMESH (THENGUMPILLIL) SMT.P.KRISHNAPRIYA SMT.P.PADMAPRIYA RESPONDENTS:

------------------------ 1.

THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM PIN 676 505.

2.

THE STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY- KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, TRANSPORT COMMISSIONARATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN 695 039.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. K.A. SANJEETHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C) NO. 30116/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 :

TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE JOINT APPLICATION DATED 28.09.2015. EXHIBIT P1(a) :

TRUE COPY OF THE CHELLAN DATED 01.10.2015.

EXHIBIT P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE TIME SCHEDULE ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY RTA, PALAKKAD.

EXHIBIT P3 :

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. (6/29393/97 DATED 18/12/1997.) EXHIBIT P4 :

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. C6/11736/2014M DATED 06.01.2015.

EXHIBIT P5 :

TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT ON 01/08/2015.

EXHIBIT P6 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 06/08/2015 ISSUED from the OFFICE OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P7 :

TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 22/09/2015 SUBMITTE DBY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE.

V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 30116 OF 2015 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 5th day of October, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner confines his relief to an early consideration of Ext.P7 representation filed to revise the timings of the operation of his stage carriage service on the route covered by the permit.

2.

I direct the respondent to consider Ext.P7 representation and decide about the necessity to revise the timings as sought within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

3.

Needless to say that the petitioner as well as the other operators on the route shall be put on notice and heard in the exercise.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd