The Manager, Skgm Aup School v. The State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/21ST ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 30224 of 2015 (C) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

--------------------- THE MANAGER, SREE KOMAN GURUKKAL MEMORIAL AIDED UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL (SKGMAUPS) KUMBALAPALLY, KASARAGOD PIN 671 314.

BY ADVS.SRI.T.R.RAVI SRI.JAWAHAR JOSE SRI.V.VINAY MENON SMT.CISSY MATHEWS SRI.ARUN AJAY SHANKAR RESPONDENTS:

------------------------ 1.

THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.

2.

THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CHITTARIKKAL, KASARAGOD DISTRICT 671 326.

3.

THANKACHAN V.S. (HEADMASTER) SREE KOMAN GURUKKAL MEMORIAL AIDED UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL KUMBALAPALLY, KASARAGOD 671 314.

4.

JOLLY GEORGE K. (L.P.S.A.) SREE KOMAN GURUKKAL MEMORIAL AIDED UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL KUMBALAPALLY, KASARAGOD 671 314.

R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 30224 of 2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT/APPROVAL ORDER DATED 1.5.2012 OF SMT. SHABANA C.K.

P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 1.4.2015 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT P3 :

TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE GOVERNMENT IN W.P.(C) 26796/2014 P4 :

TRUE COPY OF THE SENIORITY LIST AS APPROVED BY THE EDUCATIONAL AUTHORITIES P5 :

TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 24.6.2014 IN W.P.(C) 14971/2014 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 30224 of 2015 (C) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 13th day of October, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner's grievance is that Ext.P2 appointment order dated 01.04.2014 has not been considered till date by the 2nd respondent.

2.

Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to take a decision on Ext.P2, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, within one month from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment.

The Writ Petition is disposed of without any observation on merits, which shall be decided by the 2nd respondent, in accordance with law.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj 13/10/15