High Court of KeralaWP(C)/30470/2014disposed of

Manipuzha Taxi Drivers Union (A.I.T.U.C), Kottayam, Rep.By Its Secretatary Baiju.K.Joseph v. Sabarimala Festival Coordination Taxi Committee, Kottayam

2015-01-28Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/8TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 30470 of 2014 (G) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- MANIPUZHA TAXI DRIVERS UNION (A.I.T.U.C), KOTTAYAM, REP.BY ITS SECRETATARY BAIJU.K.JOSEPH, AGED 36 YEARS S/O. K.V. JOSEPH, KATTAYIL HOUSE, POOVANTHURUTHU.P.O. KOTTAYAM-686012.

BY ADV. SRI.A.P.SUBHASH RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. SABARIMALA FESTIVAL COORDINATION TAXI COMMITTEE, KOTTAYAM REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN HON'BLE KOTTAYAM DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION COLLECTORATE.P.O., KOTTAYAM-686002.

2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KOTTAYAM SUB DIVISION, KOTTAYAM-686001.

3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, COLLECTORATE.P.O., KOTTAYAM-686002.

4. REGIONAL TRTANSPORT OFFICER, KOTTAYAM-686002.

5. TOURIST TAX CO-ORDINATION COMMITTEE, KOTTAYAM INVOLGING (CI.I.U.T.

I.N.T.U.C. AND B.M.S) REPRESENTED BY ITS CO-ORDINATION COMMITTEE CONVENER RENJITH.P.U. CHENATTU HOUSE, KILINOOR NORTH.P.O., KOTTAYAM-686020.

6. SABARIMALA FESTIVAL CO-ORDINATION COMMITTEE, KOTTAYAM, INVOLVING (C.I.T.U., I.N.T.U.C. AND B.M.S.) REPRESENTED BY ITS FESTIVAL COMMITTEE CONVERE KURIAN KURIAKOSE, VELLARAYIL HOUSE PULICKALKAVALA.P.O., VAZHOOR, KOTTAYAM-686515. R5 & 6 BY ADV. SRI.SURIN GEORGE IPE R5 & 6 BY ADV. SRI.M.V.BIPIN R1 & 2,R3,R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. R. RANJITH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 30470 of 2014 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 28th day of January, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous. Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. All the contentions of the parties are left open.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE //True Copy// P.A. To Judge jjj