Naseer v. The Sub Inspector Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/20TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 30283 of 2015 (I) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- NASEER, S/O.KAREEM, AGED 33 YEARS, NEDUMPILLI, OONNUKAL P.O., NERYAMANGALAM VILLAGE, KOTHAMANGALAM TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, (OWNER OF LORRY BEARING REGISTRATION NO.KL-17-1911).
BY ADV. SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ.
RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POTHANIKKAD POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-686 693.
2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-686 693.
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 030.
BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.C.K. SHERIN.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
WP(C).No. 30283 of 2015 (I) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P1 COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT NO.646/2015 DATED 26/09/2015 OF POTHANIKKAD POLICE STATION. EXT.P2 COPY OF THE SEIZURE MAHAZAR DATED 26/09/2015 PREPARED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.
EXT.P3 COPY OF THE PASS ISSUED BY THE TAHSILDAR, DEVIKULAM DATED 23/09/2015 PERMITTING THE PETITIONER TO TRANSPORT RIVER SAND IN HIS VEHICLE.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL.
//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs.
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
***************************************************************************** W.P.(C) No.30283 of 2015 ****************************************************************************** Dated this the 12th day of October, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court on account of seizure of his vehicle bearing registration No.KL-17-1911. 2.
The petitioner submitted that he is transporting river sand with valid pass. Ext.P3 is the valid pass. It is submitted that in the pass, no route has been prescribed. It is further submitted that the first respondent seized the vehicle alleging that the petitioner deviated the route and registered a case under the Mines and Minerals(Development and Regulation) Act. This Court is of the view, if the petitioner is transporting river sand, necessarily, it has to be dealt under the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act and not under the Mines and Minerals(Development and Regulation) Act. If the petitioner is transporting the river sand with valid pass, necessarily, the petitioner's vehicle cannot be detained. Therefore, this Court is of the view, the second respondent shall take a decision in the
W.P.(C) No.30283 of 2015 2 matter to release the vehicle for interim custody within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. If the pass has been issued to the petitioner and it does not contain any route, without imposing any condition, the vehicle shall be released to the petitioner. Needful shall be done within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln