High Court of KeralaWP(C)/30317/2015disposed of

Mathukutty v. The Cochin International Airport Ltd.

2015-10-07Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/15TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 30317 of 2015 (L) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

------------------ MATHUKUTTY, AGED 64 YEARS, S/O. OUSEOPH, ATHIKKAKUZHY, KAVARAPARAMBU, NAYATHODE P.O., ANGAMALY, ERNAKULAM 683572 BY ADVS.SRI.R.SANJITH SMT.C.S.SINDHU KRISHNAH RESPONDENTS :

----------------------

1. THE COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.

REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, KOCHI 683111

2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD., KOCHI AIRPORT P.O., ERNAKULAM 683111

3. K.Y. VARGHESE, AGED 50 YEARS, KOORAN HOUSE, ANGADIKADAVU, ANGAMALY P.O. 683583

4. THE TAXI OPERATORS CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY THE COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD.

NEDUMBASSERRY KOCHI AIRPORT P.O., ERNAKULAM-683111 BY SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 30317 of 2015 (L) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE LAND ACQUISITION CERTIFICATE BEARING NO. LAC 387/1995 P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT OF THE PETITIONER. P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 14.11.2014 IN WPC.NO.30280/2014 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE bp

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

================== W.P.(C).No. 30317 of 2015 ================== Dated this the 7th day of October, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Petitioner approached the second respondent complaining that the third respondent is operating taxi based on a benefit granted to the petitioner by the first respondent to operate the taxi in the premises of Cochin International Airport. Ext.P2 is the complaint. 2.

In view of Ext.P2 complaint, there shall be a direction to the second respondent to take appropriate decision in Ext.P2 after hearing the petitioner and the third respondent within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition is disposed of, as above.

sd/- sab A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE

- : 2 :-