C.A.Muhammed Izack v. The Kerala State Electricity Board

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/28TH ASWINA, 1937HJ13 WP(C).No. 30450 of 2015 (E) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- C.A.MUHAMMED IZACK, AGED 48 YEARS S/O. ABDUL MAJEED, CHELAKKATTUTHODY HOUSE VIYYAKKURISSI P.O., MANNARKKAD P.O.

PALAKKAD DISTRICT.SUB ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL CIRCLE) KSEB, SREEKRISHNAPURAM.

BY ADV. SMT.K.V.RESHMI RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, VYDHYUTHI BHAVAN PATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (HRM) VYDHYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ELECTRICAL DIVISION, SHORNUR.

4. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER ELECTRICAL DIVISION, SREEKRISHNAPURAM.

R BY SRI.K.S.ANIL, SC, KSEB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 30450 of 2015 (E) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT. P1 :

A COPY OF THE GENERAL TRANSFER ORDER DTD.26.8.2015 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P2 :

A COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD.03.9.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.

EXT.P3 :

A COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DTD.19.9.2015 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P4 :

A COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD.22.9.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.

EXT.P5 :

A COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DTD.28.9.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL --------------------------------------- // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE SB

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.30450 of 2015 - E ====================== Dated this the 20th day of October, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that despite a transfer effected, the petitioner has not been relieved from the post he occupies.

2. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Board submits that it is only due to the transfer being effected all over the State and there is delay in relieving the persons, who were posted in pivotal post that there is delay in relieving of the petitioner. In any event, the petitioner shall be relieved within two weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment.

The writ petition would stand disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB/ 20 / 10 /2015 // true copy // P.A to Judge.