← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/30498/2015disposed of

C.Raveendran v. The Secretary

2015-10-14Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/22ND ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 30498 of 2015 (J) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ C.RAVEENDRAN, S/O.KANNAN, CHERUVATH HOUSE, KARTHIKAPPALLY P.O., VATAKARA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT:

--------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, VATAKARA - 673 101.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. K.A. SANJEETHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 30498 of 2015 (J) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT NO.P.ST-18/26/2001 DATED 27/3/2007. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DATED 3/10/2015 VEHICLE NO.KL-18/D/246 ON THE ROUTE VILAKKOTTOOR-THOTTILPALAM-VADAKARA-KOZHIKODE-THALASSERY AS LSOS.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE.

V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 30498 OF 2015 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 14th day of October, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner seeks clearance certificate in respect of his vehicle being operated on the basis of a valid route permit. Ext.P2 application put in by the petitioner in this regard shall be dealt with by the respondent within two weeks.

2. Such clearance certificate can be granted without insisting on the surrender of the existing regular permit in respect of the vehicle. It shall however be ensured that all dues to the Government including check reports and also to the Kerala Motor Transport Workers Welfare Fund Board are satisfied.

3. The respondent shall also specify a period not exceeding four months within which the petitioner shall replace the vehicle on the route covered by the permit. This is because the vehicle now in use requires to be replaced by another to resume operations on the route covered by the permit.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd