High Court of KeralaWP(C)/30512/2015disposed of

M/S.Kings Auto v. Kerala State Consumer Redressal Commission [State Commission]

2015-10-08Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE THURSDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/16TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 30512 of 2015 (L) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :

------------------------- M/S.KINGS AUTO, 24/560, SHORNUR ROAD, NURANI P.O., PALAKKAD REPRESENTED BY T.S.SWAMINATHAN, MANAGING PARTNER.

BY ADV. SRI.M.JITHESH MENON RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. KERALA STATE CONSUMER REDRESSAL COMMISSION [STATE COMMISSION], SISU VIHAR LANE, SASTHAMANGALAM P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 010.

2. DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARGOD- 671 121.

3. JOSE K.T., KANIYAPARAMBIL HOUSE, PADIMARUTHU P.O., CHULLIKKARA, KASARGOD- 671 531.

R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd.

WP(C).No. 30512 of 2015 (L) ----------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :

----------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE AWARD IN C.C.NO.282/2014 DATED 30.03.2015. EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 20.05.2015. EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE DELAY PETITION DATED 20.05.2015. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE.

Msd.

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J --------------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No. 30512 of 2015 --------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 08th day of October, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner aggrieved by the order passed by the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kasargode has approached Kerala State Consumer Redressal Commission in appeal. The petitioner also filed an application to condone delay in appeal.

2. The petitioner apprehends the execution of the order by arresting him.

2. Considering the facts and circumstances, the execution petition ordered to be deferred for a period of three months, to work out the petitioner alternate remedy before the State Commission.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE bpr