High Court of KeralaWP(C)/30627/2015disposed of

Haridas v. State Of Kerala

2015-10-08Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE THURSDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/16TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 30627 of 2015 (C) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

--------------------- HARIDAS AGED 57 YRS., S/O.SHEKHARAN NAIR, HARIDAM HOUSE, ANGAMALY P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683 572.

BY ADVS.SRI.AVANEESH KOYIKKARA SRI.LINDONS C. DAVIS RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

2. THE LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONERATE OF LAND REVENUE PUBLIC OFFICE BUILDING, MUSEUM JN., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 33.

3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR CIVIL STATIN, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM - 682 030.

4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFIER, FORT KOCHI - 682 001.

5. THE SUB REGISTRAR ANGAMALY - 683 572.

R1 TO R5 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. C.K. SHERIN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Mn ...2/-

WP(C).No. 30627 of 2015 (C) ----------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------- EXT. P1THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL PREFERRD BY THE PETITONER AND RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXT. P2TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO. 21488 OF 2014 DATED 19.8.2014.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL ---------------------------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mn

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J ------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C).No. 30627 of 2015 ------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 08th day of October, 2015

JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed by vendor of a document in respect of the property situated in Survey No.469/ 2-34 in block No.11 of Angamaly Village in Ernakulam District. The petitioner has filed a fair value appeal before the third respondent in the matter relating to fixation of fair value for the aforementioned plot. He wants to dispose the property. The limited request of the petitioner is that registering authority have to register the document under protest subject to final fixation of fair value of the property in the appeal.

2. In view of the above, there shall be a direction to the 5th respondent to register the document executed by the petitioner in respect of the aforementioned property under protest in accordance with the fair value fixed in respect of the above property. However, it is made clear that registration of the document based on fair value is

W.P.(C).No. 30627 of 2015 -2subject to final disposal of the appeal relating to the property by the competent authority. If the appeal is disposed of reducing the present fair value, necessarily, competent authority shall refund the excess stamp duty paid on the document to the person who paid the stamp duty and corresponding registration fee. In view of pendency of Ext.P1 appeal before the District Collector, Ernakulam, there shall be a direction to the District Collector, to dispose of the appeal after affording an opportunity to the petitioner of being heard within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE bpr